Ballistics in trial are inconclusive

Thursday, June 26, 2008

David Wright with the Kansas Bureau of investigations testified in the trial of Theron Thomas Kent this afteroon and said that ballistic evidence in the case was determined to be inconclusive.

Wright testified that he examined bullet fragments taken from Beau Arndt's body and based upon examination determined the evidence to be inconclusive. Wright said he could neither identify or eliminate that the bullet fragments came from the gun submitted as evidence.

Later in testimony, Wright said while the bullet fragments were determined to be inconclusive, the bullet jacket, which is a coating that covers the actual bullet was detmined to have been shot from the rifle submitted in evidence. Another examiner verified that there was an agreement for the cartage case when compared to test fires with the rifle. This dermination wasn't reached until the final comparisons were done.

Stay turned for further details on the trial.

Post a comment

We allow registered users to post comments on this Web site. Our goal with this feature is to encourage thoughtful discussions about the news stories. Using the comment feature to make random attacks on people is not acceptable. Emporiagazette.com neither endorses nor guarantees the accuracy of any user contribution. Responsibility for what is posted or contributed to this site is the sole responsibility of each user. To learn more about our posting policies please read our User Poster Agreement Policy.

Requires free Emporia.com registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Advertisement

Featured Event

ESU Honors Band Concert

Albert Taylor Hall, Saturday at 4 p.m.

The best of area High Schools!

Today's events

More events

Advertisement